home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!dookie.demon.co.uk
- From: Jonathan Belson <jon@dookie.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,demon.tech.amiga
- Subject: Re: Amiga Software and Dealers.
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc,demon.tech.amiga
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 96 13:09:53 GMT
- Message-ID: <9601201309.AA00446@dookie.demon.co.uk>
- References: <9601182256.NA169186@pyrotek.demon.co.uk>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: dookie.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
- X-Mail2News-Path: relay-4.mail.demon.net!post.demon.co.uk!dookie.demon.co.uk
-
- Jason G Doig (jase@pyrotek.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- : Jonathan Belson, (jon@dookie.demon.co.uk) uttered:
- :
- : > It makes a difference which mode you run it in DblNTSC is quicker than
- : > DblPAL because of bandwidth considerations, also FastRom makes a
- : > difference.
- :
- : Not by much it isn't. 256 colour hires in either of those will eat up
- : your bandwidth. Put up with pal interlace and it'll run a bit faster.
-
- Yeah? I though DblNTSC was a fair bit quicker...must've imagined it 8^)
- I find ntsc interlace is *slightly* easier on the eyes (30Hz flicker).
-
- C-YA
- Jon
-